Try our new documentation site (beta).
Modify a model
Examples: diet, feasopt, fixanddive, gc_pwl_func, lpmod, sensitivity, workforce3, workforce4, workforce5
This section considers model modification. Modification can take many forms, including adding constraints or variables, deleting constraints or variables, modifying constraint and variable attributes, changing constraint coefficients, etc. The Gurobi examples don't cover all possible modifications, but they cover the most common types.
diet
This example builds a linear model that solves the classic diet problem: to find the minimum cost diet that satisfies a set of daily nutritional requirements. Once the model has been formulated and solved, it adds an additional constraint to limit the number of servings of dairy products and solves the model again. Let's focus on the model modification.
Adding constraints to a model that has already been solved is no
different from adding constraints when constructing an initial model.
In C, we can introduce a limit of 6 dairy servings through the
following constraint (where variables 6 and 7 capture the
number of servings of milk and ice cream, respectively):
printf("\nAdding constraint: at most 6 servings of dairy\n"); cind[0] = 7; cval[0] = 1.0; cind[1] = 8; cval[1] = 1.0; error = GRBaddconstr(model, 2, cind, cval, GRB_LESS_EQUAL, 6.0, "limit_dairy");In C++:
cout << "\nAdding constraint: at most 6 servings of dairy" << endl; model.addConstr(buy[7] + buy[8] <= 6.0, "limit_dairy");In Java:
lhs.addTerm(1.0, buy[8]); model.addConstr(lhs, GRB.LESS_EQUAL, 6.0, "limit_dairy");In C#:
Console.WriteLine("\nAdding constraint: at most 6 servings of dairy"); model.AddConstr(buy[7] + buy[8] <= 6.0, "limit_dairy");In Python:
print('\nAdding constraint: at most 6 servings of dairy') m.addConstr(buy.sum(['milk', 'ice cream']) <= 6, "limit_dairy")
For linear models, the previously computed solution can be used as an
efficient warm start for the modified model. The Gurobi
solver retains the previous solution, so the next optimize
call
automatically starts from the previous solution.
lpmod
Changing a variable bound is also straightforward. The
lpmod
example changes a single variable bound, then
re-solves the model
in two different ways. A variable bound can be changed by modifying
the UB
or LB
attribute of the variable. In C:
error = GRBsetdblattrelement(model, "UB", minVar, 0.0);In C++:
v[minVar].set(GRB_DoubleAttr_UB, 0.0);In Java:
minVar.set(GRB.DoubleAttr.UB, 0.0);In C#:
minVar.UB = 0.0;In Python:
minVar.UB = 0.0The model is re-solved simply by calling the
optimize
method
again. For a continuous model, this starts the optimization from the
previous solution. To illustrate the difference when solving the
model from an initial, unsolved state, the lpmod
example calls
the reset
function.
In C:
error = GRBreset(model, 0);In C++, Java, and Python:
model.reset();In C#:
model.Reset();When we call the optimize method after resetting the model, optimization starts from scratch. Although the difference in computation time is insignificant for this tiny example, a warm start can make a big difference for larger models.
fixanddive
The fixanddive
example provides another example of bound
modification. In this case, we repeatedly modify a set of variable
bounds, utilizing warm starts each time. In C, variables are fixed
as follows:
for (j = 0; j < nfix; ++j) { fixval = floor(fractional[j].X + 0.5); error = GRBsetdblattrelement(model, "LB", fractional[j].index, fixval); if (error) goto QUIT; error = GRBsetdblattrelement(model, "UB", fractional[j].index, fixval); if (error) goto QUIT; error = GRBgetstrattrelement(model, "VarName", fractional[j].index, &vname); if (error) goto QUIT; printf(" Fix %s to %f ( rel %f )\n", vname, fixval, fractional[j].X); }In C++:
for (int i = 0; i < nfix; ++i) { GRBVar* v = fractional[i]; double fixval = floor(v->get(GRB_DoubleAttr_X) + 0.5); v->set(GRB_DoubleAttr_LB, fixval); v->set(GRB_DoubleAttr_UB, fixval); cout << " Fix " << v->get(GRB_StringAttr_VarName) << " to " << fixval << " ( rel " << v->get(GRB_DoubleAttr_X) << " )" << endl; }In Java:
for (int i = 0; i < nfix; ++i) { GRBVar v = fractional.get(i); double fixval = Math.floor(v.get(GRB.DoubleAttr.X) + 0.5); v.set(GRB.DoubleAttr.LB, fixval); v.set(GRB.DoubleAttr.UB, fixval); System.out.println(" Fix " + v.get(GRB.StringAttr.VarName) + " to " + fixval + " ( rel " + v.get(GRB.DoubleAttr.X) + " )"); }In C#:
for (int i = 0; i < nfix; ++i) { GRBVar v = fractional[i]; double fixval = Math.Floor(v.X + 0.5); v.LB = fixval; v.UB = fixval; Console.WriteLine(" Fix " + v.VarName + " to " + fixval + " ( rel " + v.X + " )"); }In Python:
for i in range(nfix): v = fractional[i] fixval = int(v.X+0.5) v.LB = fixval v.UB = fixval print(' Fix %s to %g (rel %g)' % (v.VarName, fixval, v.X))Again, the subsequent call to
optimize
starts from the
previous solution.
sensitivity
The sensitivity
example computes the optimal objective value
associated with fixing each binary variable to 0 or 1. It first
solves the given model to optimality. It then constructs a
multi-scenario model, where in each scenario a binary variable is
fixed to the complement of the value it took in the optimal
solution. The resulting multi-scenario model is solved, giving the
objective degradation associated with forcing each binary variable off
of its optimal value.
feasopt
The last modification example we consider is feasopt
, which
adds variables to existing constraints and also changes the
optimization objective. Setting the objective to zero is
straightforward. In C, set the Obj
attribute to 0:
for (j = 0; j < numvars; ++j) { error = GRBsetdblattrelement(model, "Obj", j, 0.0); if (error) goto QUIT; }In the object-oriented interfaces, call
setObjective
with an
empty linear expression.
In C++:
// clear objective feasmodel.setObjective(GRBLinExpr(0.0));In Java:
// Clear objective feasmodel.setObjective(new GRBLinExpr());In C#:
// Clear objective feasmodel.SetObjective(new GRBLinExpr());In Python:
# clear objective feasmodel.setObjective(0.0)Adding new variables is somewhat more complex. In the example, we want to add artificial variable(s) to each constraint in order to allow the constraint to be relaxed. We use two artificial variables for equality constraints and one for inequality constraints. The Python code for adding a single artificial variable to constraint
c
in C is:
error = GRBgetstrattrelement(model, "ConstrName", i, &cname); if (error) goto QUIT; vname = malloc(sizeof(char) * (6 + strlen(cname))); if (!vname) goto QUIT; strcpy(vname, "ArtN_"); strcat(vname, cname); vind[0] = i; vval[0] = -1.0; error = GRBaddvar(model, 1, vind, vval, 1.0, 0.0, GRB_INFINITY, GRB_CONTINUOUS, vname); if (error) goto QUIT;In C++:
double coef = -1.0; feasmodel.addVar(0.0, GRB_INFINITY, 1.0, GRB_CONTINUOUS, 1, &c[i], &coef, "ArtN_" + c[i].get(GRB_StringAttr_ConstrName));In Java:
GRBConstr[] constrs = new GRBConstr[] { c[i] }; double[] coeffs = new double[] { -1 }; feasmodel.addVar(0.0, GRB.INFINITY, 1.0, GRB.CONTINUOUS, constrs, coeffs, "ArtN_" + c[i].get(GRB.StringAttr.ConstrName));In C#:
GRBConstr[] constrs = new GRBConstr[] { c[i] }; double[] coeffs = new double[] { -1 }; feasmodel.AddVar(0.0, GRB.INFINITY, 1.0, GRB.CONTINUOUS, constrs, coeffs, "ArtN_" + c[i].ConstrName);In Python:
feasmodel.addVar(obj=1.0, name="ArtN_" + c.ConstrName, column=gp.Column([-1], [c]))We use the
column
argument of the addVar
method to
specify the set of constraints in which the new variable participates,
as well as the associated coefficients. In this example, the new
variable only participates in the constraint to be relaxed. Default
values are used here for all variables attributes except the objective
and the variable name.